Annual or perennial, terrestrial, amphibious or aquatic herbs, sometimes undershrubs, rarely shrubs or small trees, sometimes hemiparasitic or holoparasitic on roots and lacking chlorophyll
Stems cylindrical or quadrangular, sometimes ribbed or narrowly winged
Leaves opposite and/or alternate, or rarely whorled, sometimes fascicled or radical, simple, entire to deeply divided, rarely reduced to scales or aborted; stipules 0
Flowers bisexual, strongly to slightly irregular, rarely subregular or regular, pedicellate or not, solitary axillary or in terminal or at times subterminal and lateral cymes or racemes, in such forms as spikes, heads, panicles or thyrses
Bracts opposite or alternate, free or adnate to pedicel, rarely to calyx; bracteoles 0 or 2
Calyx usually (4)5-lobed, or rarely, by modification, 2- or 3-lobed or spathaceous, usually ± united, persistent, tube from almost lacking to long, usually cylindrical to campanulate; lobes equal or not, valvate, variously overlapping or open in bud
Corolla sympetalous, (3)4- or 5(6-8)-lobed, usually campanulate, cylindrical or ventricose or enlarged above, or bilabiate with upper (posterior) lip entire, 2- or sometimes 4-lobed, erect, concave, ± hooded, flat or spreading; lower (anterior) lip (1)3(4)-lobed, spreading; sometimes corolla ± unilabiate with tube split in front and limb of 4(5) lobes; tube straight, or variously curved to geniculate, at times oblique, sometimes with 1 or 2 spurs, sacs or hollows at base or in throat; lobes subequal or posterior pair shorter, ± spreading
Stamens usually 4, didynamous or at times ± equal, or 2 with sometimes 2 reduced to staminodes, or 5 with fifth subrudimentary, rarely perfect, alternating with corolla lobes, exserted or included; filaments arising in corolla tube or at throat, filiform or dilated, free, confluent or decurrent down tube, occasionally with lower pair variously appendaged at base, there sometimes anterior filaments twisted around and thus occupying posterior position; anthers usually bithecate, sometimes synthecate (at length unithecate by confluence of 2 thecae), at times unithecate, free or often coherent; thecae equal or with one smaller and at times sterile; staminodes 0, 1 or 2
Nectary/disc various, often annular or unilateral at base of ovary, sometimes obsolete
Ovary superior, bilocular (rarely ± unilocular or trilocular), sessile, entire, with carpels median; placentas central, adnate to septum or rarely parietal; ovules usually many, sometimes few or 1 per locule, often seated on pulvinate funicle with central depression; style terminal, simple, usually filiform; stigma entire or 2(3)-lobed
Fruit usually a capsule, loculicidal and/or septicidal, sometimes dehiscing by pores or by meridional fissures, or indehiscent and then at times separating into 2 1-seeded nutlets (cocci), or rarely 1 nutlet by abortion, seldom a berry, rarely a fleshy drupe
Seeds small to minute, 1-many per locule, variously shaped, pitted, furrowed, ridged, ribbed or winged, rarely smooth; embryo straight to weakly curved; endosperm oily
Classification Notes:
Classification and delimitation of the Scrophulariaceae are problematical, and in its present circumscription the family is not considered monophyletic (Olmstead & Reeves 1995). The Selaginaceae, established as a family by Choisy (1823), and accepted as such by Dyer (1975), Dahlgren (1980), Cronquist (1988, under Globulariaceae) and Hartley & Balkwill (1990), is here included in Scrophulariaceae. This is in agreement with, among others, Hilliard (1990, 1994 and 1999), Philcox (1990), Brummitt (1992), Mielcarek (1996) and Takhtajan (1997)
*Orobanchaceae is also difficult to separate from Scrophulariaceae. Some genera have been moved back and forth between them, such as Buchnera L., Harveya Hook., Hyobanche L. and *Orobanche L. The two families have been treated as distinct by, for example, Cronquist (1988), Kreutz (1995) and Mabberley (1997). Others recognise *Orobanchaceae as part of Scrophulariaceae, such as Brummitt (1992), Thorne (1992), Mielcarek (1996) and Takhtajan (1997), and they are followed here.
Recent research is leading to publication of other classification schemes. For instance, based on evidence from morphology, DNA base-pair sequences and chemistry, Judd et al. (1999) divide the genera here placed under Scrophulariaceae into three families which they consider monophyletic:
1. Scrophulariaceae, which includes the closely related Scrophularia L. and *Verbascum L. These two genera are seen as closely linked phenetically to Selago L. and relatives (Selagineae) by the intermediate group of Sutera Roth and relatives (Manuleae)
2. Plantaginaceae, which comprises Plantago L., Bacopa Aubl., Limnophila R.Br., *Linaria Mill., Lindernia All., Mimulus L., Nemesia Vent., *Scoparia L. and others
3. *Orobanchaceae, which includes the parasitic genera, such as *Orobanche L. and Harveya Hook.
Oftia Adans. and Hiernia S.Moore, listed by Dyer (1975) under Scrophulariaceae, are retained under that family, the first with reservation. Oftia has been placed in Verbenaceae, Myoporaceae, Scrophulariaceae or in a separate family of its own. Takhtajan (1997) placed it in Oftiaceae, next to the Scrophulariaceae, but noted it shows similarities with Teedia, in the last family. Oftia is regarded here as an anomalous genus in Scrophulariaceae. Charadrophila Marloth, usually placed under Gesneriaceae (also by Dyer 1975), was transferred by Weber (1989) to Scrophulariaceae, mainly because of its capsular fruits. This was accepted by Brummitt (1992) and Mabberley (1997) and is followed here. In Scrophulariaceae the genus occupies an isolated position, possibly near Alonsoa Ruiz & Pav. (Weber 1989), although it has features aligning it with the Rhinanathoideae.
Some exotic species of genera such as *Cymbalaria Hill, *Linaria Mill., Mimulus L., *Verbascum L. and Veronica L. are widely cultivated and may occur as garden escapes. Others are found as weeds, for example *Kickxia Dumort., *Scoparia L., *Misopates Raf. and *Orobanche L.
The southern Africa genera of Scrophulariaceae can be classified based mainly on the classification system of Takhtajan (1997) and groupings of genera into tribes by Hilliard (1994, 1999), Fischer (1992), Barringer (1993) and Steiner (1996 and pers. com. 2000). However, relationships are far from definite and several genera are of very uncertain affinity (marked by ? in the scheme)
Nomenclature:
Scrophulariaceae
Choisy: 71 (1823)
Bentham: 186 (1846)
Bentham: 913, 1126 (1876)
Wettstein: 39 (1891/1893)
Hallier: 181 (1903)
Hiern: 121 (1904)
Hiern & Stapf: 421 (1904)
Hemsley & Skan: 261 (1906)
Merxmüller & Roessler: 1 (1967a)
Merxmüller & Roessler: 1 (1967b)
Webb: 202 (1972)
Hilliard & Burtt: 155 (1977)
Visser: 82 (1981)
Sutton: 1 (1988)
Hilliard & Burtt: 179 (1989)
Hilliard: 315 (1990)
Philcox: 1 (1990)
Brummitt: 665 (1992)
Fischer: 1 (1992)
Hilliard: 1 (1994)
Mielcarek: 3 (1996)
Steiner: 63 (1996)
Mabberley: 1 (1997)
Retief & Herman: 548, 603, 617 (1997)
Takhtajan: 451 (1997)
Hilliard: 1 (1999)
Distribution & Notes:
Global: Genera ± 290, species ± 4500 (including *Orobanchaceae, Selaginaceae & Charadrophila); cosmopolitan but especially temperate areas and tropical mountains
HIERN, W.P. & STAPF, O. 1904. Orobanchaceæ. Flora capensis 4,2
HILLIARD, O.M. 1990. A brief survey of Scrophulariaceae - Selagineae. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 47
HILLIARD, O.M. 1994. The Manuleae. A tribe of Scrophulariaceae. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
HILLIARD, O.M. 1999. The tribe Selagineae (Scrophulariaceae). Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh
HILLIARD, O.M. & BURTT, B.L. 1977. Notes on some plants of southern Africa chiefly from Natal: VI. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 35
HILLIARD, O.M. & BURTT, B.L. 1989 ('1988'). Notes on some plants of southern Africa chiefly from Natal: XV. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 45
MABBERLEY, D.J. 1997. The plant-book, edn 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
MERXMÜLLER, H. & ROESSLER, H. 1967a. Scrophulariaceae. Prodromus einer Flora von Südwestafrika 126
MERXMÜLLER, H. & ROESSLER, H. 1967b. Selaginaceae. Prodromus einer Flora von Südwestafrika 127
MIELCAREK, R. 1996. Les Scrophulariaceae dans la flore d'Afrique centrale (excl. Linderneae). Fragmenta floristica et geobotanica 41
PHILCOX, D. 1990. Scrophulariaceae. Flora zambesiaca 8,2
RETIEF, E. & HERMAN, P.P.J. 1997. Plants of the northern provinces of South Africa: keys and diagnostic characters. Strelitzia 6
STEINER, K.E. 1996. Chromosome numbers and relationships in tribe Hemimerideae (Scrophulariaceae). Systematic Botany 21
SUTTON, D.A. 1988. A revision of the tribe Antirrhineae. British Museum (Natural History), London
TAKHTAJAN, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York
VISSER, J. 1981. Scrophulariaceae and Orobanchaceae. South African parasitic flowering plants. Juta, Cape Town
Copyright of the content hosted by this website remains with the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), unless stated otherwise. Material from this site may be used in other media, provided that SANBI is acknowledged by the name South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) or refer to the 'How to cite this resource' paragraph on the Home page. Liability disclaimer: Visitors use this site at their own risk and SANBI is not liable for any of the consequences resulting therefrom.
Welcome to Biodiversity Advisor 2.0!
Biodiversity Advisor, developed by the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) and its Data Partners, is a system that will provide integrated biodiversity information to a wide range of users who will have access to geospatial data, plant and animal species distribution data, ecosystem-level data, literature, images and metadata.
The integrated information comes from our much-loved Botanical Database of Southern Africa (BODATSA) also known as Plants of Southern Africa (POSA), Zoological Database of Southern Africa (ZODATSA), Biodiversity Geographic Information System (BGIS), SANBI's institutional repository (Opus) and others.
The system is still under development, so you may find a few bugs/issues. If you do, please report it via the error reporting button available in various sections of the website or provide us with any useful feedback you may have via the ‘Give us feedback’ option available in the sidebar menu. You can create a free account for yourself by clicking on the user profile icon which will take you through to the login page. Here you can choose the ‘Create an account’ option or simply fill in your details if you have an account already. Having an account on Biodiversity Advisor will provide users with free access to biodiversity resources.
In future, Team SANBI will be able to log in using their day-to-day login details, BGIS users will be able to use their existing accounts and details, and general users will be able to log in using their LinkedIn profile, but for now you will need to create an account.