Dyschirius fulvus fumosus (Klug, 1855)
DD

Occurrence records map

This map contains point-based occurrences at different locations

iNaturalist: Data partners records: DNA:

Residence status

Occurrence in African countries and South African provinces. Residence status indicates if a taxon is indigenous, endemic, or alien in a specific region. This data is based on specimen records and literature.

FSA

SA

BOT

NAM

ESW

LES

WC

EC

NC

FS

GA

KZN

LP

MP

NW

Absent

Indigenous

Endemic

Naturalised

Invasive

Names and Sources

No known common names.

Classification

KINGDOM Animalia

PHYLUM Arthropoda

CLASS Insecta

SPECIES fumosus

No results found for Dyschirius fulvus fumosus (Klug, 1855)

No results found for Dyschirius fulvus fumosus (Klug, 1855)

0 results for Dyschirius fulvus fumosus (Klug, 1855)

Narrow your results

Narrow your results

Year

Province

Animal occurrence records per dataset

Animal occurrence records per year

Occurrence records map

This map contains point-based occurrences at different locations

iNaturalist: Data partners records: DNA:

No literature available.

Status

Global

Status and criteria

DD

Assessment date

2016-01-14

Assessor(s)

Plantae Coordinator

Reviewer(s)

Plantae Coordinator

Habitat

Major system

Terrestrial

Ecosystem and cultural services

The Pouched Mouse is a generalist that inhabits savannah woodland areas across southern Africa, but this species complex may include a number of groups, specifically dependent on various habitat types. For example, in the Kalahari they occur in the short grass habitats surrounding dry pans (Skinner & Chimimba 2005), in Namibia they are present in the arid western regions and along riverbeds of the Namib Desert, but in Tussen-die-Riviere Nature Reserve, Free State, they were caught in shrub grassland regions (Watson 2006). They are also associated with rocky habitats (such as in Rolfontein Nature Reserve, Northern Cape; Jooste & Palmer 1982), lowveld forest edges, closed coastal forests, and marshy habitats (Skinner & Chimimba 2005). Rautenbach et al. (2014) sampled one at Phinda Private Game Reserve, KwaZulu-Natal in Acacia nilotica/Dichrostachys cinera bushveld. In Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park, KwaZulu-Natal, they only occurred in areas where large herbivores were absent (Hagenah et al. 2009). This species can also make use of modified landscapes, including degraded grasslands, old lands and gardens.

This species complex is crepuscular or nocturnal in habits, and often trapped shortly after dark (MacFadyen 2007). They are slow moving and mild tempered, and may be handled with ease. It is an important prey species, and regularly recorded from owl pellets (MacFadyen 2007). They usually dig burrows, but also readily use the burrows of other animals (Perrin 2013), and on release readily take refuge in the nearest burrow (MacFadyen 2007). They appear to be affected by cool temperatures, and are often inactive in traps after cold evenings (MacFadyen 2007). They are solitary, with only one individual occupying a single burrow, except during the breeding season when females are found together with their young (Ellison 1993). Reproduction is seasonal, with females giving birth during the warm, wet, summer months (Skinner & Chimimba 2005) following a gestation period of 20–21 days (Earl 1978). Large litters are produced, with an average of 7.1 young (range = 1–10; N = 15) (Smithers 1971; Smithers & Wilson 1979) and young are weaned after a period of about 25 days (Westlin-van Aarde 1989).
They hoard food opportunistically (Ellison 1993), and are omnivorous, feeding on a variety of seeds, vegetation and insects (Watson 1987; Kerley 1992; Monadjem 1997). Watson (1987) found that in Kruger National Park their diets varied with season, with insects constituting a larger proportion of their diet during drought periods, compared to periods of high rainfall. However, throughout both seasons, seeds formed the dominant food type, compared to both insects and herbage (Watson 1987).

Ecosystem and cultural services: This species forms an important prey base for nocturnal carnivores and raptors. As a result of its digging ability, it will be involved in soil nutrition and aeration and is a valuable species for seed dispersal.

Population Trend

This species is relatively common across its range. Numbers fluctuate seasonally with fewer occurring in cool, dry weather (Perrin 2013). It was the second most common species after Mastomys natalensis on the northern plains, Kruger National Park, and the population at N’washitshumbe enclosure site in northern Kruger is estimated at 9 animals / ha (MacFadyen 2007). At Tswalu Kalahari Reserve there were 5 animals / ha (D. MacFadyen unpubl. data). Density varies according to habitat and burning regime (see Perrin 2013). In the Acacia woodland habitats of Imfolozi Game Reserve, abundance was found to increase during drought periods (Bowland 1986); however, this region is more mesic compared to the rest of this species’ distribution. Following taxonomic resolution, if S. campestris is split into separate species, this population status could change.

Threats

There are no major threats to this adaptable species as they are widely distributed and locally common (Perrin 2013). However, the following pressures may cause local population declines:
  1. Urbanisation: this species is impacted by traffic, dogs and urban security practices, i.e. high walls, etc.
  2. Mining: areas which are transformed by incorrect mining practices would impact abundance and distribution.
  3. Pet trade: this species complex behaves similarly to hamsters and are known to habituate well, thus they are occasionally kept as pets. This is, however, expected to have a minimal impact on the population.
  4. Bushmeat: it is likely that this species is eaten opportunistically, because they are easily caught and are mild in nature.

Uses and Trade

Listed as Least Concern because this is a widespread and locally common species within the assessment region, occurring in several protected areas, including Kruger National Park and Tswalu Kalahari Reserve. This species is adaptable and can live in modified habitats such as rural gardens, and there is no identified threat that could cause widespread population decline. Its wide habitat use allows this species to inhabit semi-deserts, grasslands, savannahs and forests and it has also been recorded on the edges of marshes and vleis.

Regional population effects: It is distributed widely in the sub-region, and there is possible movement from Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Botswana and Namibia into South Africa. The ability of this species to utilise transformed habitats, including degraded grassland and agricultural land, increases the rescue effect of this species.

Conservation

Listed as Least Concern because this is a widespread and locally common species within the assessment region, occurring in several protected areas, including Kruger National Park and Tswalu Kalahari Reserve. This species is adaptable and can live in modified habitats such as rural gardens, and there is no identified threat that could cause widespread population decline. Its wide habitat use allows this species to inhabit semi-deserts, grasslands, savannahs and forests and it has also been recorded on the edges of marshes and vleis.

Regional population effects: It is distributed widely in the sub-region, and there is possible movement from Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Botswana and Namibia into South Africa. The ability of this species to utilise transformed habitats, including degraded grassland and agricultural land, increases the rescue effect of this species.

Bibliography

JOURNAL ARTICLE
Pinhey, E. 1965. Odonata from Luanda and the Lucala River, Angola. Revista de Biologia, Lisboa. 5:159-164

JOURNAL ARTICLE
Samways, M.J. 1999. Diversity and conservation status of South African dragonflies (Odonata). Odonatologica. 28:13-62